Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3424 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-940 - 125 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-940 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 19% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - €49.0 vs €60.24
- Up to 17% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - €0.4 vs €0.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12937 minutes ago
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12937 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |