Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 945 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - 101 vs 100 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 12% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - €53.15 vs €60.24
- Up to 12% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G4900 - €0.53 vs €0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12432 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
100
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12432 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |