Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than FX-6300 - 697 vs 684 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 18% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - €49.68 vs €60.24
- Up to 22% better value when playing Valorant than Celeron G4900 - €0.07 vs €0.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12863 minutes ago
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12863 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |