Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - €49.68 vs €154.27
- Up to 55% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-3770 - €0.86 vs €1.93 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 38% better in League of Legends than FX-6300 - 80 vs 58 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4365 minutes ago
Buy for €154.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |