Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-6300 vs Celeron G4900

FX-6300 vs Celeron G4900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than FX-6300.

Advantages of AMD FX-6300

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900

  • Performs up to 5% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6300 - 62 vs 59 FPS
  • Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Cyberpunk 2077.
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

RT Overdrive

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

59

95%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


FPS

62

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.97/FPS

100%

Price, €

€60.24

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151

Buy for 60.24 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 112 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

RT Overdrive

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

463

75%

Multi-Core

1453

100%

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


Single-Core

616

100%

Multi-Core

1051

72%

AMD FX-6300 Logo

AMD FX-6300

vs
Intel Celeron G4900 Logo

Intel Celeron G4900

Oct 23rd, 2012Release Date
Apr 3rd, 2018
FXCollectionCeleron
VisheraCodenameCoffee Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
6
Cores2
6
Threads2
3.5 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.1 GHz
4.1 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
95 WTDP
54 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
17.5xMultiplier
31.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 610
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.