Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2332 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - €60.24 vs €546.05
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75767 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3930K Prozessor (3,2GHz, 12MB-Cache, Sockel 2011)
Buy for €546.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
