Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 280 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €60.24 vs €430.01
- Up to 82% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900KF - €0.13 vs €0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G4900 - 594 vs 463 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
463
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16268 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
594
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
18%
Price, €
€430.01
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16269 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |