Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €60.24 vs €390.97
- Up to 78% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-13700K - €0.54 vs €2.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 45% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G4900 - 161 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
111
68%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18027 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.43/FPS
22%
Price, €
€390.97
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18027 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |