Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €60.24 vs €299.16
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-10600K - €0.41 vs €1.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Celeron G4900 - 154 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17688 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.94/FPS
21%
Price, €
€299.16
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17688 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |