Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €60.24 vs €154.89
- Up to 57% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i5-11600KF - €0.13 vs €0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G4900 - 522 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
456
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17857 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
522
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
43%
Price, €
€154.89
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €154.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17857 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |