Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - €60.24 vs €113.77
- Up to 33% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-11400 - €0.65 vs €0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G4900 - 117 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
93
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9274 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
67%
Price, €
€113.77
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |