Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Dota 2 than Core i5-10400 - 237 vs 205 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €120.06 vs €154.89
- Up to 9% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i5-11600KF - €0.59 vs €0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
90%
Price, €
€154.89
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €154.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12424 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €120.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |