Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1430 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i7-6800K - 59 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - €120.06 vs €127.21
- Up to 12% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-6800K - €2.03 vs €2.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €120.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12996 minutes ago
Buy for €127.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |