Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 335 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-6700 - 175 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - €127.21 vs €157.91
- Up to 20% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-6700 - €0.73 vs €0.91 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€127.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €127.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17941 minutes ago
Buy for €157.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17941 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |