Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 97 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 543 vs 529 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €399.99 vs €430.01
- Up to 4% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-9900KF - €0.76 vs €0.79 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 24 vs 16 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
543
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
96%
Price, €
€430.01
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17717 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
529
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17717 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |