Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 807 vs 761 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €303.87 vs €399.99
- Up to 28% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €0.38 vs €0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
807
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€303.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €303.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |