Buy on Amazon
€270.82
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 194 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €270.82 vs €379.64
- Up to 37% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €1.4 vs €2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€270.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €270.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5297 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
87%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
62%
Price, €
€379.64
71%
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1920X
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 12 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
