Buy on Amazon
€264.87
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1764 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-6600K - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €174.27 vs €264.87
- Up to 34% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i9-10900F - €0.92 vs €1.39 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
66.18705035971225%
Price, €
€264.87
65%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €264.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58293 minutes ago
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
190
99.47643979057592%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€174.27
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I5-6600K Prozessor (3,5 GHz, 6 M Cache, LGA1151)
Buy for €174.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1419
84.66587112171837%
Multi-Core
4012
47.6145264657014%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
