Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1752 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-8300 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €73.57 vs €82.0
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |