Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 414 vs 346 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €318.6 vs €399.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €0.77 vs €1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10923 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
414
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€318.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €318.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10922 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |