Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €60.24 vs €344.13
- Up to 70% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-13700F - €1.31 vs €4.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 72% better in Starfield than Celeron G4900 - 79 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
46
58%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15886 minutes ago
Buy for €344.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15886 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |