Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 357 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G4900 - 127 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - €38.0 vs €60.24
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74422 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 1600x Prozessor
Buy for €38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
54.853072128227964%
Multi-Core
1051
22.05203524968527%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
