Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 357 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 49% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G4900 - 85 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - €45.0 vs €60.24
- Up to 50% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G4900 - €0.53 vs €1.06 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13074 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |