Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - €60.24 vs €110.49
- Up to 39% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-10100 - €0.6 vs €0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G4900 - 113 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
101
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15027 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
61%
Price, €
€110.49
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €110.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15028 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |