Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 145 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$181.91 vs CA$257.31
- Up to 25% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-10320 - CA$1.33 vs CA$1.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.77/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$257.31
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19443 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
137
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$181.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$181.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |