Buy on Amazon
CA$257.31
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 and the cheaper Core i5-10400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-10400 - 131 vs 128 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$174.99 vs CA$257.31
- Up to 30% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-10320 - CA$1.37 vs CA$1.96 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.96/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$257.31
68%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9463 minutes ago
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
128
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110400
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
