Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K and the more expensive Core i3-10320 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i3-10320 - 205 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$229.99 vs CA$257.31
- Up to 12% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-10320 - CA$1.12 vs CA$1.27 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11653 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$229.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11654 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |