Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600K is 938 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 1% better in New World than Core i3-10320 - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$218.88 vs CA$259.45
- Up to 17% better value when playing New World than Core i3-10320 - CA$1.85 vs CA$2.22 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$259.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$218.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |