Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 559 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9500.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-9500 - 178 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$228.88 vs CA$257.31
- Up to 10% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10320 - CA$1.3 vs CA$1.45 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
89%
Price, CA$
CA$257.31
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11382 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
176
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$228.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11382 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-9500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |