Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$184.99 vs CA$219.69
- Up to 5% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-13100F - CA$1.64 vs CA$1.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-10400 - 127 vs 113 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$184.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$184.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
127
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.73/FPS
94%
Price, CA$
CA$219.69
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$219.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |