Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 16 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$44.99 vs CA$158.07
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 167 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75008 minutes ago
Buy for CA$158.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75009 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
55.296229802513466%
Multi-Core
1051
19.147385680451812%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |