Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 812 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 170 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than FX-9590 - CA$33.99 vs CA$340.0
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 51 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65396 minutes ago
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |