Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2835 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-9590 - 146 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than FX-9590 - CA$256.79 vs CA$340.0
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74703 minutes ago
Buy for CA$256.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74704 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |