Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1542 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 10% better in New World than FX-9590 - 109 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than FX-9590 - CA$200.98 vs CA$340.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing New World than FX-9590 - CA$1.84 vs CA$3.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 180 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
109
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |