Buy on Amazon
CA$41.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 808 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - CA$41.21 vs CA$110.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-3820 - CA$0.38 vs CA$0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1840 - 111 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
109
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1840 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.8 GHz 2M 53W LGA1150
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
111
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$110
37%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
