Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 920 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - CA$41.21 vs CA$185.7
- Up to 77% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-2700K - CA$0.27 vs CA$1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 53 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1840 - 157 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
155
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17233 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
157
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$185.7
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$185.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |