Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3111 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 21% better in Rust than Core i7-2700K - 197 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - CA$157.24 vs CA$185.7
- Up to 30% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-2700K - CA$0.8 vs CA$1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$185.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
197
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |