Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - CA$41.21 vs CA$214.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-11400 - CA$0.07 vs CA$0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 27% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1840 - 771 vs 606 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
606
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
771
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$214.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$214.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |