Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 761 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$41.21 vs CA$258.88
- Up to 83% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6900K - CA$0.32 vs CA$1.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1840 - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
128
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18956 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.93/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18957 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |