Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3180 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - CA$41.21 vs CA$249.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 5 7600 - CA$0.2 vs CA$1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1840 - 233 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
211
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
233
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.07/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$249
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |