Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$258.88 vs CA$312.4
- Up to 5% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13400 - CA$1.51 vs CA$1.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6900K - 197 vs 171 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15871 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.59/FPS
94%
Price, CA$
CA$312.4
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$312.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15870 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |