Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$41.21 vs CA$219.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-11600 - CA$1.65 vs CA$2.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 200% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1840 - 75 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
25
33%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
75
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.93/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$219.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$219.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |