Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$41.21 vs CA$216.99
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 46% better in Rust than Celeron G1840 - 228 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77632 minutes ago
Buy for CA$216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
23.798303487276154%
Multi-Core
854
10.42989741084514%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |