Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1076 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$41.21 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$0.81 vs CA$3.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 61% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1840 - 82 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
51
62%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19239 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
82
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.05/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$250
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |