Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1750 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6900K - 199 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$214.99 vs CA$258.88
- Up to 23% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6900K - CA$1.08 vs CA$1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$214.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16108 minutes ago
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |