Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1840 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1840 is 932 days newer than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than FX-6100 - 156 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than FX-6100 - CA$41.21 vs CA$98.43
- Up to 60% better value when playing Rust than FX-6100 - CA$0.26 vs CA$0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |