Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - CA$41.21 vs CA$104.99
- Up to 58% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-8100 - CA$0.15 vs CA$0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1840 - 290 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
274
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
290
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |