Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 81 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - CA$41.21 vs CA$84.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-4370 - CA$0.13 vs CA$0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1840 - 342 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
319
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
342
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |