Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 23% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6100 - 168 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - CA$98.43 vs CA$162.05
- Up to 25% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 3400G - CA$0.72 vs CA$0.96 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
168
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$162.05
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$162.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
137
81%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |