Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$82.49 vs CA$196.23
- Up to 47% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.55 vs CA$1.04 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 25% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than FX-6100 - 188 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
150
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$82.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$82.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3595 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3595 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |