Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 14% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8150 - 512 vs 450 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$87.12 vs CA$196.23
- Up to 50% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.19 vs CA$0.38 per FPS
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
512
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5530 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
450
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5529 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |