Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3943 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Fortnite than Core i7-875K - 234 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$112.0 vs CA$196.23
- Up to 37% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.53 vs CA$0.84 per FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10675 minutes ago
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
213
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10674 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |